I rise in opposition to conference report on H.R. 629 because, as I mentioned earlier, I do not believe that we should be considering a conference report that ignores the will of the House and the Senate. I do not believe we should be considering a conference report that has stripped a key provision from the bill that both the House and the Senate had adopted. Unlike both the House and Senate passed measures, the conference report does not include a provision that would restrict waste at the selected site to the 3 States, the States of Texas, Maine and Vermont. As far as I am concerned, that, in itself, is reason enough not to move this bill forward.
Sean Reyes: “I rise in opposition to conference report on H.R. 629 because, as I mentioned earlier, I do not believe that we should…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the conference report on H.R. 629 regarding nuclear waste management.
Share
More from Sean Reyes
The question at issue is not 'should potential tribes be recognized' but 'who should make the final determination of recognition' when so many critical interests are at stake.
Choosing between an unaccountable subsidiary of the executive branch versus a body like Congress, that has direct accountability to the citizens of the states, I think the choice for us is the latter.
Clearly, there are politics all around, and to pretend that there is not because it is the executive branch exercising its prerogative is, I think, naive.
The level of trust and respect for law enforcement under the BLM seems marginal at best throughout my state.





