Mr. Chairman, to my good friend and colleague, the gentleman from Ohio, if this amendment were to become law, then that would mean that this country would be in serious trouble, because what this amendment does, it advocates the equivalent of martial law for communities along the border, the equivalent of martial law, where whole regions of this country who are already suffering from lack of infrastructure, lack of support, lack of money, many, many different needs that we have along our border communities would, in a very disparate way, be affected by the utilization of the military, under the guise of terrorism. My friend speaks about good legislation sometimes taking many years. A bad idea I think does not deserve its time and its place, and certainly this amendment does not deserve to be considered by this body.
Sean Reyes: “Mr. Chairman, to my good friend and colleague, the gentleman from Ohio, if this amendment were to become law, then that…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to military presence in border communities during a committee discussion.
Share
More from Sean Reyes
Would that result in people being discriminated against, say, for a place on a board of directors based on political viewpoint?
Our amendment stands both for fairness and the integrity of the National Flood Insurance Program. In El Paso, which is my district, FEMA is currently in the process of issuing new floodplain maps. Initially, the community didn't think much…
Once again, Mr. Speaker, let me reassure my good friend and colleague from Arizona that the report, along with all the listing of earmarks, was filed appropriately, timely with the Rules Committee. Where the glitch occurred was in the…
Socialism takes away liberty. It takes away free will, and socialism does not ask what is in the best interest of the individual.





