Is this provision in H.R. 3283, therefore, intended to change this fact in any way or to impose any new obligations on the Commerce Department or the United States beyond those already set forth in U.S. law?
Share
More from Rob Bishop
This ban is even more ridiculous after we just locked in mandatory spending of $900 million in perpetuity with the so-called Great American Outdoors Act.
Is the gentleman sure he really wants the Federal Government having a forest in his place?
I think many of those local fisheries on the coast would have some quibbling with your jurisdictional approach.
Both states and the Federal Government should play key roles in managing fisheries.
Other voices in this conversation
