I think some of my staff thought I should be a little bit more expansive in my remarks. So this is a really good bill with a really good sponsor. Actually, this is one of those things where the nice part is, for this mitigation plan that will allow these projects to go forward, taxpayers are paying no money. It's paid by the utility ratepayers of this particular area. If this is not reauthorized, it may put that part in jeopardy. And we did put some guidelines in there to protect so that the overhead that can be charged to the utility ratepayers has a potential limit on it. It's a good bill. With that, I urge its adoption, and I yield back the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Utah (Mr. Bishop) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 6060. The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the rules were suspended and the bill was passed. A motion to reconsider was laid on the table. ____________________
Rob Bishop: “I think some of my staff thought I should be a little bit more expansive in my remarks. So this is a really good bill…”
On the recordSeptember 19, 2012
Share
More from Rob Bishop
Nov 16, 2020
the Magnuson-Stevens Act is not just for the conservation and management of fishery resources, but also to assure that our citizens benefit from employment, food supply, and revenue which could be generated from these resources.
Nov 16, 2020
There really is no reason to add to this hearing--unless it is to give Members another 5 minutes to campaign, or speak on the bills. It is kind of a waste of time.
Dec 3, 2020
Twenty years from now, come back here, and we will tell the gentleman we told him so. Madam Speaker, I have no objections to the bill, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Nov 16, 2020
I think many of those local fisheries on the coast would have some quibbling with your jurisdictional approach.





