This is a very simple amendment, an easily understandable one. It simply has two parts to it. Number one is you continue the funding authorization that is in the current law; and, number two, you add a 5-year sunset period in there. As I said earlier when we were talking about the base bill, there is nothing wrong with the things that we should be doing, but there is something wrong when we refuse to periodically exercise our legislative responsibility to review those things that we are currently doing. We do it all the time. The Endangered Species Act has a sunset, FLPMA has a sunset, The Elementary and Secondary Education Act has a sunset, all of which are designed to have us come back here and reevaluate what we are doing to make sure that our priorities have stayed the same. There is nothing wrong with a sunset. In fact, it should be standard fare in most of our pieces of legislation. If we are now creating this bill, which replicates AmeriCorps one more time, there is nothing wrong with saying let's review it every 5 years to make sure we are still going on the path we originally determined.
Rob Bishop: “This is a very simple amendment, an easily understandable one. It simply has two parts to it. Number one is you continue…”
On the recordMarch 20, 2010
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is discussing an amendment that includes a funding authorization and a sunset provision for legislative review.
Share
More from Rob Bishop
Nov 16, 2020
Instead of helping, it seems the Majority is more interested in putting fishermen's livelihood at risk in the name of faux conservation.
Dec 3, 2020
This is a good bill, and we obviously have no problems with this particular bill. When I started, I talked about kleinigkeiten on the small stuff. As good as this is, it is still small stuff and, actually, it is taken out--it is a portion…
May 31, 2020
This hearing, as far as understanding truth of what went on, and coming up with a good history, is going to be invalid.





