I wish to simply address a couple of the issues that have been brought up again. In comparing this particular bill to two others, one specifically still held up in the committee, it is true that one bill did have a donation, which is what he is patterning after, so the Grand Teton bill is very similar to this: Willing donor. The other bill by the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Jindal) is with the Jean Lafitte National Park. This is the ability of coming up with area that is necessary for protecting from the devastation of hurricanes. It is also area coming mainly from State and local lands, not from private owners, and we do not actually oppose the boundary revisions because it makes sense on a case-by-case basis in this particular area, especially when the cost for the land is only $1,000 per acre. It would only increase the size of this particular national site by 15 percent, not the 44 percent as in this one.
Rob Bishop: “I wish to simply address a couple of the issues that have been brought up again. In comparing this particular bill to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing comparisons between different bills related to national parks and land protection.
Share
More from Rob Bishop
The Majority is pushing a so-called 30x30 idea, locking up 30 percent of our oceans by 2030, all under the guise of protecting biodiversity while tackling climate change.
This is a good bill, and we obviously have no problems with this particular bill. When I started, I talked about kleinigkeiten on the small stuff. As good as this is, it is still small stuff and, actually, it is taken out--it is a portion…
I know that when Democrats were in the Minority, they used to object to some of the titles which we had on our hearings.
This hearing, as far as understanding truth of what went on, and coming up with a good history, is going to be invalid.





