On the recordJuly 30, 2011
On rollcall No. 682, I was unavoidably detained. Had I been present, I would have voted ``no.'' ____________________
On rollcall No. 682, I was unavoidably detained. Had I been present, I would have voted ``no.'' ____________________
Share
More from Rob Bishop
The Dingell Act, 2 years ago, was bipartisan. If this were bipartisan, we would not be here. But to illustrate that, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Gosar).
the Magnuson-Stevens Act is not just for the conservation and management of fishery resources, but also to assure that our citizens benefit from employment, food supply, and revenue which could be generated from these resources.
Instead of helping, it seems the Majority is more interested in putting fishermen's livelihood at risk in the name of faux conservation.
Is there any time remaining? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Utah has 15 minutes remaining.