The amendment offered by Mr. Pearce is critical to protecting ranchers who produce our food from the negative consequences of this bill. Without the Pearce language, ranchers would be left to the whims of future Secretaries of Interior that will diminish ranching opportunities. Already, grazing rights are under assault on multiple fronts. There is a simple element out there that loathes grazing on public land. And our food supply is, indeed, worthy of protection and worthy of the use of our public land. Despite opposition to this amendment in committee, I hope the other side will now recognize that granting these small protections in the legislation is, indeed, our duty. We cannot abandon our responsibility to legislate by leaving to bureaucrats the opportunity to isolate bankrupt ranchers dependent upon grazing. We thank Mr. Pearce for his foresight and determination to protect grazing rights now and in the future, and urge support of his amendment.
Rob Bishop: “The amendment offered by Mr. Pearce is critical to protecting ranchers who produce our food from the negative…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of an amendment to protect ranchers' grazing rights.
Share
More from Rob Bishop
I know that when Democrats were in the Minority, they used to object to some of the titles which we had on our hearings.
As now we come to some of the realities of this particular bill and the procedures. Mr. Speaker, it would be nice if we actually dealt with the good of the body and recognize that reauthorizations are important so that we can reevaluate…
Both states and the Federal Government should play key roles in managing fisheries.
Does that clearance have to be in the form of a written statement to the Chair? The SPEAKER pro tempore. As the Chair previously advised, that request cannot be entertained absent the appropriate clearance, which has not been received by…





