On the recordSeptember 20, 2016
For CEQ, it appears that advancing a questionable agenda at all costs is more important that ensuring that the law, science, and sound economic reasonings are going to be honored.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Bishop criticizes the CEQ's guidance as prioritizing agenda over legal and scientific integrity.
Share
More from Rob Bishop
Dec 3, 2020
The NOAA Corps is a very small, underutilized but uniformed service group. It prevents questions with this type of group, with their history that they have, first of all: Why should they exist in the first place? But more significantly…
Oct 1, 2020
Is the Speaker telling me that if the Republicans have cleared this bill and are in favor of it, it has to have a written clearance from the Democrat side more than simply verbal commitment to the Tribes? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair…
Oct 1, 2020
Does that clearance have to be in the form of a written statement to the Chair? The SPEAKER pro tempore. As the Chair previously advised, that request cannot be entertained absent the appropriate clearance, which has not been received by…
Jul 22, 2020
The Dingell Act, 2 years ago, was bipartisan. If this were bipartisan, we would not be here. But to illustrate that, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Gosar).
Other voices in this conversation
