On the recordJanuary 8, 2018
This idea that we did not have any of those discussions is one of the most bogus claims that happens to be there.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Bishop refutes claims of lack of discussion regarding the Public Lands Initiative.
Share
More from Rob Bishop
Oct 1, 2020
Is the Speaker telling me that if the Republicans have cleared this bill and are in favor of it, it has to have a written clearance from the Democrat side more than simply verbal commitment to the Tribes? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair…
Oct 1, 2020
Did you tell me the form the clearance has to have? In what form must it be? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair has advised only that appropriate clearance must be provided. It has not been so provided, and so the Chair cannot entertain…
May 31, 2020
Instead, we decided to move ahead with what can only be described as really good political theater.
Jul 22, 2020
The Dingell Act, 2 years ago, was bipartisan. If this were bipartisan, we would not be here. But to illustrate that, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Gosar).
Other voices in this conversation
