That means there will be an extended cost of doing business associated with this particular plan. Even though when we say anyone making over $250,000 will not be taxed, it will be taxed. Once again, if that was simply a salaried employee--a salaried employee--that sounds pretty good. But that covers almost all the businesses we have who are small in this country, and large as well. Once again, it does go to the point we tried to make a little bit earlier. The Shadegg bill, the Price bill, the other Republicans' bills that should have been allowed to be debated, they don't have any of those provisions. So that negative anti-job aspect that is definitely a part of this bill if it's pushed through does not necessarily have to be there if you simply allowed the other ideas to be debated, discussed openly here on the floor.
Rob Bishop: “That means there will be an extended cost of doing business associated with this particular plan. Even though when we…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is discussing the economic impact of a proposed tax plan and advocating for alternative proposals.
Share
More from Rob Bishop
Instead of helping, it seems the Majority is more interested in putting fishermen's livelihood at risk in the name of faux conservation.
I know that when Democrats were in the Minority, they used to object to some of the titles which we had on our hearings.
One final parliamentary inquiry. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman will state his parliamentary inquiry.
We have talked about several of the problems with this particular bill. With this particular bill, we have talked about how the poor reckoning of its sources there do not say what is going to happen if this money does not develop. I think…





