The problem that we have is that what your goals are, which seem to be extremely rational and progressive, is not indicative of the verbiage that is in this proposed rule.
Rob Bishop: “The problem that we have is that what your goals are, which seem to be extremely rational and progressive, is not…”
Editor's note · Context
Bishop critiques the proposed rule's language and its potential for litigation.
Share
More from Rob Bishop
This hearing, as far as understanding truth of what went on, and coming up with a good history, is going to be invalid.
Does that clearance have to be in the form of a written statement to the Chair? The SPEAKER pro tempore. As the Chair previously advised, that request cannot be entertained absent the appropriate clearance, which has not been received by…
There really is no reason to add to this hearing--unless it is to give Members another 5 minutes to campaign, or speak on the bills. It is kind of a waste of time.
the Magnuson-Stevens Act is not just for the conservation and management of fishery resources, but also to assure that our citizens benefit from employment, food supply, and revenue which could be generated from these resources.





