No. Mr. McGOVERN. Madam Speaker, further parliamentary inquiry. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman will state his inquiry. Mr. McGOVERN. Is it true that the rule can be amended on the floor? The SPEAKER pro tempore. At this point, only if the gentleman from Utah offers an amendment or yields to another Member for that purpose. Mr. McGOVERN. Further parliamentary inquiry. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman will state his inquiry. Mr. McGOVERN. Is it true that the gentleman from Utah could yield for the purpose of a unanimous consent request to amend the rule? The SPEAKER pro tempore. That is correct. Mr. McGOVERN. Further parliamentary inquiry, Madam Speaker. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman will state his inquiry. Mr. McGOVERN. Is it true that the gentleman is continuing to prevent the House from debating and voting on the McGovern-Jones amendment simply because the Republican leadership is afraid it will pass? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman is not stating a proper parliamentary inquiry. The gentleman from Utah is recognized for 1 hour.
Rob Bishop: “No. Mr. McGOVERN. Madam Speaker, further parliamentary inquiry. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman will state his…”
On the recordMay 17, 2012
Share
More from Rob Bishop
Jul 22, 2020
We have talked about several of the problems with this particular bill. With this particular bill, we have talked about how the poor reckoning of its sources there do not say what is going to happen if this money does not develop. I think…
Jul 22, 2020
The Dingell Act, 2 years ago, was bipartisan. If this were bipartisan, we would not be here. But to illustrate that, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Gosar).
Oct 1, 2020
Did you tell me the form the clearance has to have? In what form must it be? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair has advised only that appropriate clearance must be provided. It has not been so provided, and so the Chair cannot entertain…





