No. Mr. McGOVERN. Madam Speaker, further parliamentary inquiry. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman will state his inquiry. Mr. McGOVERN. Is it true that the rule can be amended on the floor? The SPEAKER pro tempore. At this point, only if the gentleman from Utah offers an amendment or yields to another Member for that purpose. Mr. McGOVERN. Further parliamentary inquiry. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman will state his inquiry. Mr. McGOVERN. Is it true that the gentleman from Utah could yield for the purpose of a unanimous consent request to amend the rule? The SPEAKER pro tempore. That is correct. Mr. McGOVERN. Further parliamentary inquiry, Madam Speaker. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman will state his inquiry. Mr. McGOVERN. Is it true that the gentleman is continuing to prevent the House from debating and voting on the McGovern-Jones amendment simply because the Republican leadership is afraid it will pass? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman is not stating a proper parliamentary inquiry. The gentleman from Utah is recognized for 1 hour.
Share & report
More from Rob Bishop
PREPA needs to continue to pursue conversion of their power generation assets off of burning inefficient Venezuelan bunker fuel and onto clean and efficient liquified natural gas.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Let's get a couple of things very clear. First of all, this is not about the Land and Water Conservation Fund. We reauthorized permanently the Land and Water Conservation Fund in the…
There really is no reason to add to this hearing--unless it is to give Members another 5 minutes to campaign, or speak on the bills. It is kind of a waste of time.
The Majority is pushing a so-called 30x30 idea, locking up 30 percent of our oceans by 2030, all under the guise of protecting biodiversity while tackling climate change.





