You are strongly opposed to it because it would take too much work to try and implement a solution ahead of time. That testimony is the indication of some entity that has simply spent too long in bureaucratic excess and not actually trying to do things that help people.
Rob Bishop: “You are strongly opposed to it because it would take too much work to try and implement a solution ahead of time. That…”
Editor's note · Context
Bishop criticizes the administration's opposition to legislation due to bureaucratic inefficiency.
Share
More from Rob Bishop
This ban is even more ridiculous after we just locked in mandatory spending of $900 million in perpetuity with the so-called Great American Outdoors Act.
Twenty years from now, come back here, and we will tell the gentleman we told him so. Madam Speaker, I have no objections to the bill, and I yield back the balance of my time.
We have talked about several of the problems with this particular bill. With this particular bill, we have talked about how the poor reckoning of its sources there do not say what is going to happen if this money does not develop. I think…
Since the minority leader is supportive, or I wouldn't be here, and I am the ranking member and I am supportive of it, and the Navajo Nation has been told. The chairman of the committee is in support of it, does that not constitute the…





