Political Quotes

Rob Bishop: In closing, whether this cattle ranch becomes part of our national inventory or not may indeed be a good idea. But one…

On the recordJanuary 19, 2010
In closing, whether this cattle ranch becomes part of our national inventory or not may indeed be a good idea. But one of the things I think we are saying right now is the scope these processes have to go through--and the process does become important. Poor process produces poor policy. What we are arguing in this particular case is if we should allow the process to go through to its completion. There are questions that still have to be asked that yet have a quantified answer to them. Neighbors may be in support, but we want those things quantified, which should be part of the process that is there. There should be private property rights in this particular document for the protection of private property owners, and that should be boilerplate language we add in all legislation--not just this, but the rest that comes through. The question that we should be asking, which is what the study should be asking as well, is not necessarily do we go forth in this particular one but should we look at this as the only way of preserving or moving forward on this cattle ranch in the future? Is this indeed the best way? Are there other concepts that could be used? And should this be the $50 million budget priority of this particular Congress? Those are the types of questions that should have been answered in the committee before this bill moved forward, and that's what we asked in committee and we're asking again on the floor.
Said by
Rob Bishop
Republican · Utah
Source
govinfo.gov
Jan 19, 2010

Editor's note · Context

The speaker discusses the importance of process and questions surrounding a cattle ranch bill.

Share

More from Rob Bishop

Dec 10, 2020

Yesterday, I called Lisa Pittman, who is the counsel for our committee, to make sure we had somebody covering us for floor time. She chastised me then, saying that under my condition, I need to ask about calling a doctor first, not calling…

govinfo.gov
May 31, 2020

This hearing, as far as understanding truth of what went on, and coming up with a good history, is going to be invalid.

congress.gov
Oct 1, 2020

One final parliamentary inquiry. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman will state his parliamentary inquiry.

govinfo.gov
Nov 16, 2020

There really is no reason to add to this hearing--unless it is to give Members another 5 minutes to campaign, or speak on the bills. It is kind of a waste of time.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation