So since you are going to spend the amount of money one way or the other, why would you actually--why in the world would anyone want to spend that much money for the rails into an antiquated facility when you can actually get a better facility if you just spend the money the first way of moving it, which is the right thing to do?
Rob Bishop: “So since you are going to spend the amount of money one way or the other, why would you actually--why in the world would…”
Editor's note · Context
Bishop questions the rationale behind spending on outdated facilities instead of relocating.
Share
More from Rob Bishop
Twenty years from now, come back here, and we will tell the gentleman we told him so. Madam Speaker, I have no objections to the bill, and I yield back the balance of my time.
The Dingell Act, 2 years ago, was bipartisan. If this were bipartisan, we would not be here. But to illustrate that, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Gosar).
Instead, we decided to move ahead with what can only be described as really good political theater.
Is the Speaker telling me that if the Republicans have cleared this bill and are in favor of it, it has to have a written clearance from the Democrat side more than simply verbal commitment to the Tribes? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair…





