Political Quotes

Rob Bishop: Yes. And our ICBMs, for example, need to stay there until the year 2030. That's their planned life. But what happens if…

On the recordApril 14, 2010
Yes. And our ICBMs, for example, need to stay there until the year 2030. That's their planned life. But what happens if you do one of those solid rocket motors and you pull it out to do the inspection and there is a problem with it? Where are the experts to go in and find out what went wrong, and how do you solve that problem in the future? Where are the niche suppliers who are no longer in the market? This is one of those things. So I'm talking about nails for the future of our missile defense system that are being lost because we simply didn't think ahead--or this administration didn't think ahead. DOD sent us a report last year that said if you slowed down Constellation, it would have a significant negative impact. Secretary for Acquisitions in the Department of Defense said that this industrial base is not our birthright. If we lose this industrial base, we may never get it back. And all of them are saying--General Keller said the same thing, that he is not comfortable with the direction we're going because the cost overruns that will come to the defense system simply means, obviously, NASA and Department of Defense did not talk one with another. The Augustine Commission report that was supposedly giving a report on what we would do with our space in the future said, This is a problem. The industrial base situation is a significant problem if, indeed, you stop the Constellation program. You need to work that ahead. NASA did not do it.
Said by
Rob Bishop
Republican · Utah
Source
govinfo.gov
Apr 14, 2010

Editor's note · Context

The speaker addresses concerns about the future of missile defense and the industrial base related to the Constellation program.

Share

More from Rob Bishop

Dec 3, 2020

The NOAA Corps is a very small, underutilized but uniformed service group. It prevents questions with this type of group, with their history that they have, first of all: Why should they exist in the first place? But more significantly…

govinfo.gov
Nov 16, 2020

There really is no reason to add to this hearing--unless it is to give Members another 5 minutes to campaign, or speak on the bills. It is kind of a waste of time.

congress.gov
Jul 22, 2020

Let's get a couple of things very clear. First of all, this is not about the Land and Water Conservation Fund. We reauthorized permanently the Land and Water Conservation Fund in the last Congress, and in doing that, in a House Republican…

govinfo.gov
Nov 16, 2020

This ban is even more ridiculous after we just locked in mandatory spending of $900 million in perpetuity with the so-called Great American Outdoors Act.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation