I would like to resolve one of the issues that I think is resolvable, on the Smith amendment. What the Senator is concerned about is he wanted a floor on the amount of damage, so that incidental damage by citizens who are engaged in peaceful or nonviolent demonstrations or protests would not trigger the antiterrorism language of this bill. I ask my colleague from Delaware if he would agree that a definition of ``terrorist'' in this legislation is not intended to apply to American citizens engaged in a nonviolent or peaceful demonstration, or demonstrations or protests where incidental damage to property may occur.
Orrin Hatch: “I would like to resolve one of the issues that I think is resolvable, on the Smith amendment. What the Senator is…”
On the recordJune 6, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the Smith amendment related to the definition of 'terrorist' in antiterrorism legislation.
Share
More from Orrin Hatch
Sep 25, 2018
The prices on everything from toothbrushes, groceries, and cars will rise in 2019 if not sooner.
Sep 24, 2018
I appreciate the majority leader's remarks in a wide variety of ways. What a great leader he is. We all should pay very strict attention to the way he handles himself and his seriousness about our U.S. Senate. Last night, Senate Democrats…
Sep 25, 2018
I intend to focus this morning on the investigation that was self-initiated by the Department of Commerce under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to determine whether imports of automobiles and automotive parts threaten to…





