On the recordJuly 13, 2004
The States would have great flexibility under this amendment. But they could not change the definition of the traditional terms. The Senator is correct in his interpretation.
Source
govinfo.govOrrin Hatch: “The States would have great flexibility under this amendment. But they could not change the definition of the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the flexibility of states under a proposed amendment.
Share
More from Orrin Hatch
Sep 25, 2018
Our trade policy should strengthen our relationships with our allies while targeting China's most harmful trade practices.
Sep 18, 2018
I know of no further debate on the bill. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there further debate? Hearing none, the bill having been read the third time, the question is, Shall the bill pass? The bill (H.R. 1551), as amended, was passed.
Sep 26, 2018
I wish to enter a few remarks into the Record regarding section 103(a) of the Music Modernization Act, which the Senate recently passed. By striking current sections 114(f)(1) and (2) of title 17 and substituting a new section 114(f)(1)…
Other voices in this conversation
