Mr. President, at the request of the Committee, Mr. Estrada provided copies of his annual performance evaluations during this tenure at the Solicitor General's office. These documents cast serious doubt on Mr. Bender's allegations about Mr. Estrada. The evaluations show that during each year that Mr. Estrada worked at the SG's Office, he received the highest possible rating of ``outstanding'' in every job performance category. The rating official who prepared and signed the performance reviews for 1994 to 1996 was none other than Paul Bender. Let me read a few excerpts from the evaluations that Mr. Bender signed. They say that Mr. Estrada: States the operative facts and applicable law completely and persuasively, with record citations, and in conformance with court and office rules, and with concern for fairness, clarity, simplicity, and conciseness.
Orrin Hatch: “Mr. President, at the request of the Committee, Mr. Estrada provided copies of his annual performance evaluations during…”
On the recordFebruary 5, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Defending the performance evaluations of judicial nominee Miguel Estrada during Senate debate.
Share
More from Orrin Hatch
Nov 27, 2018
I am grateful to my colleagues and especially my colleague from Louisiana for his kind remarks on the floor of the U.S. Senate. It means so much to me. I want him to know that. I want the others to realize how much I appreciated their…
Sep 26, 2018
The Congressional Budget Office projects that the PBGC's multiemployer insurance system will exceed resources available to pay claims by $45 billion.
Sep 18, 2018
I know of no further debate on the bill. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there further debate? Hearing none, the bill having been read the third time, the question is, Shall the bill pass? The bill (H.R. 1551), as amended, was passed.





