I agree with the criticisms of Judge Aiken's decision. She did indicate that she imposed the sentence in order for the defendant to receive treatment. In her opinion, treatment was the only way she could prevent this individual from repeating his heinous crimes. I seriously question the wisdom of her decision. But to her credit, Judge Aiken stated that if she had to do it all over again, she would have imposed a lengthy prison term. She recognized her mistake and she learned from it, and it was made in the early tenure of her judgeship. A review of her record since the Dye case suggests that she has more than learned from this original error.
Orrin Hatch: “I agree with the criticisms of Judge Aiken's decision. She did indicate that she imposed the sentence in order for the…”
On the recordJanuary 28, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Defending Judge Aiken's record during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Orrin Hatch
Sep 25, 2018
These tariffs cause American manufacturers and farmers to pay more to conduct business and consumers to pay more to buy these things.
Dec 19, 2018
what can you say about a dear friend who has passed away? That he was brilliant? And supremely accomplished? That he loved family and church? And the law? And people from all walks of life? To say these things does not nearly capture the…
Dec 19, 2018
on May 14, 2018, the Supreme Court in Murphy v. NCAA, 138 S. Ct. 1461, 2018, struck down the Federal prohibition of State-authorized sports wagering schemes. I was one of four original authors of that prohibition, the Professional and…





