Basically, what the administration is after here is that if a burglar is coming into your home and the police come to investigate, they don't have to report to a judge within 96 hours. The police have to act on these terrorist matters. If they find that a terrorist has infiltrated a computer controlling an electrical grid system, they want to get right on the ball and do something about it. That is what they are trying to do with this provision. There are no fourth amendment rights implicated because you have people who have hacked into a computer that they don't have any right to be in. We want to give law enforcement the power to stop that. This provision upsets that power and basically puts us back where we are when we can't do anything in a modern digital age to stop terrorists from stopping power grids and damaging dams and a whole raft of other things.
Orrin Hatch: “Basically, what the administration is after here is that if a burglar is coming into your home and the police come to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing law enforcement powers related to terrorism and digital security.
Share
More from Orrin Hatch
I appreciate the majority leader's remarks in a wide variety of ways. What a great leader he is. We all should pay very strict attention to the way he handles himself and his seriousness about our U.S. Senate. Last night, Senate Democrats…
I want to thank my dear colleague from Iowa. He is one of the greatest Senators I have served with. He is just a wonderful friend and a wonderful Senator. He has worked his tail off the whole time he has been here. I am grateful for his…
for more than four decades, I have had the distinct privilege of serving in the United States Senate--what some have called the world's greatest deliberative body. Speaking on the Senate floor, debating legislation in committee, corralling…





