the Clinton administration, as my distinguished colleague just said, opposes the creation of an office for the enforcement of employer sanctions. The Congress should be about cutting the Federal bureaucracy, not adding to it. This bill throws another $100 million of employer sanctions enforcement on top of the $43 million spent in the current year on worksite enforcement. Sanctions have not worked. They are a burden on business, especially small business. They cause discrimination against those who look and sound foreign. The Judiciary Committee struck the office from the bill. Frankly, I urge the rejection of the Bradley amendment for those reasons.
Orrin Hatch: “the Clinton administration, as my distinguished colleague just said, opposes the creation of an office for the…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the creation of an office for employer sanctions during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Orrin Hatch
The prices on everything from toothbrushes, groceries, and cars will rise in 2019 if not sooner.
I am grateful to my colleagues and especially my colleague from Louisiana for his kind remarks on the floor of the U.S. Senate. It means so much to me. I want him to know that. I want the others to realize how much I appreciated their…
I thank Senators Alexander, Whitehouse, Grassley, Feinstein, Coons, and Kennedy for all of their hard work on this important bill. I am touched by this gesture. I also thank all of the staffs involved, including those in the cloakroom, and…
The Congressional Budget Office projects that the PBGC's multiemployer insurance system will exceed resources available to pay claims by $45 billion.





