We do not because it is a true constitutional amendment and, frankly, there are those on the other side who I think will argue that the courts ought to have some control. We just want to avoid that particular argument.
Orrin Hatch: “We do not because it is a true constitutional amendment and, frankly, there are those on the other side who I think will…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a constitutional amendment during Senate debate.
Share
More from Orrin Hatch
what can you say about a dear friend who has passed away? That he was brilliant? And supremely accomplished? That he loved family and church? And the law? And people from all walks of life? To say these things does not nearly capture the…
I appreciate the majority leader's remarks in a wide variety of ways. What a great leader he is. We all should pay very strict attention to the way he handles himself and his seriousness about our U.S. Senate. Last night, Senate Democrats…
Understanding what is happening in field and regional offices is critical in the role of executive leader of the agency.
I rise today to introduce the Traumatic Brain Injury Program Reauthorization Act of 2018. I want to thank my colleague, Senator Casey, for working with me once again on important legislation to reauthorize the Federal Traumatic Brain…





