Although the amendment is described as only attacking "payday loans," it imposes new and burdensome regulation on virtually any company that offers consumer loans, including automobile or truck loans, or that cashes personal checks and charges a fee. It represents an attempt to use Federal law to in effect abolish "payday loans", intruding into an area traditionally reserved to the States. Although lenders who provide "payday loans" are an easy target because the credit they offer is expensive, they in fact provide access to legitimate, short term credit for many poor families who otherwise would be forced to borrow from loan sharks to cover short term emergencies. Some borrowers, particularly poor borrowers, cannot qualify with conventional lenders. For that reason, some States permit "payday" lenders to operate. This amendment would in effect drive payday lenders out of business. It also is vastly overbroad, imposing new, burdensome regulation on many legitimate businesses.
Orrin Hatch: “Although the amendment is described as only attacking "payday loans," it imposes new and burdensome regulation on…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment targeting payday loans during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Orrin Hatch
for more than four decades, I have had the distinct privilege of serving in the U.S. Senate, what some have called the world's greatest deliberative body. Speaking on the Senate floor, debating legislation in committee, corralling the…
I thank Senators Alexander, Whitehouse, Grassley, Feinstein, Coons, and Kennedy for all of their hard work on this important bill. I am touched by this gesture. I also thank all of the staffs involved, including those in the cloakroom, and…
I know of no further debate on the bill. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there further debate? Hearing none, the bill having been read the third time, the question is, Shall the bill pass? The bill (H.R. 1551), as amended, was passed.





