I did ask him what his religion was, after all of these questions that were asked in a very extensive hearing where religion was put squarely in issue by the other side. I did ask him that because I wanted to establish that this had gone too far. I don't intend to ever ask that question again. I don't think my colleagues will. The distinguished Senator from Vermont said he will never ask that question, and he criticized me for doing so. But I think it was highly justified under the circumstances, and I think we made a pretty good case tonight that it was justified, although I am sure some of my colleagues will take umbrage. But let them take umbrage. People all over this country are starting to say there is litmus test arising. Certainly there are outside groups that are trying to smear our nominees--especially Attorney General Pryor, Judge Kuhl, and Mr. Holmes.
Orrin Hatch: “I did ask him what his religion was, after all of these questions that were asked in a very extensive hearing where…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the questioning of nominees' religions during Senate hearings.
Share
More from Orrin Hatch
These tariffs cause American manufacturers and farmers to pay more to conduct business and consumers to pay more to buy these things.
I appreciate the majority leader's remarks in a wide variety of ways. What a great leader he is. We all should pay very strict attention to the way he handles himself and his seriousness about our U.S. Senate. Last night, Senate Democrats…
today I wish to speak about legislation to reauthorize the Emergency Medical Services for Children program administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration's Maternal and Child Health Bureau. I want to thank my fellow bill…
I know of no further debate on the bill. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there further debate? Hearing none, the bill having been read the third time, the question is, Shall the bill pass? The bill (H.R. 1551), as amended, was passed.





