Let me finish answering your question. He could have asked: What do you feel about the first amendment? Are you kidding? That is not a question that should be asked a judicial nominee. And any judicial nominee would answer: What I feel is irrelevant--which is the way he answered it. It is what the law says. Frankly, he answered that time after time after time on question after question after question. Where were the written questions of the distinguished Senator from New York? They were not there. You had a chance to do it. You didn't do it. Now, after the fact, 2 years later, this man has been sitting there, waiting for fairness, being treated totally unfair, and he can't get--my gosh, he can't get a vote up or down, which is what the Washington Post says we should do.
Orrin Hatch: “Let me finish answering your question. He could have asked: What do you feel about the first amendment? Are you kidding?…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the treatment of a judicial nominee during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Orrin Hatch
for more than four decades, I have had the distinct privilege of serving in the U.S. Senate, what some have called the world's greatest deliberative body. Speaking on the Senate floor, debating legislation in committee, corralling the…
today I wish to speak about legislation to reauthorize the Emergency Medical Services for Children program administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration's Maternal and Child Health Bureau. I want to thank my fellow bill…
the Finance Committee has worked with the Treasury Department to ensure proper responsiveness to committee inquiries. We are continuing to review these matters to determine what further oversight is required.





