Having set out the 1998 IOM study, I compare its tone and ask the Senator if he agrees with the April 1998 CBO report called ``The Proposed Tobacco Settlement: Issue From a Federal Perspective?'' Now, this CBO paper examines the literature and paints a far murkier picture of the state of evidence than did the IOM study. For example, the first sentence of this section, entitled ``Response of Youth'' states--and I ask the Senator if he is aware of this quote--``In contrast with the consistent responsiveness of adults to changes in price, the evidence on how young people respond is highly variable?''
Orrin Hatch: “Having set out the 1998 IOM study, I compare its tone and ask the Senator if he agrees with the April 1998 CBO report…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the differences between the 1998 IOM study and the April 1998 CBO report on tobacco settlement.
Share
More from Orrin Hatch
today I wish to speak about legislation to reauthorize the Emergency Medical Services for Children program administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration's Maternal and Child Health Bureau. I want to thank my fellow bill…
the Finance Committee has worked with the Treasury Department to ensure proper responsiveness to committee inquiries. We are continuing to review these matters to determine what further oversight is required.
on May 14, 2018, the Supreme Court in Murphy v. NCAA, 138 S. Ct. 1461, 2018, struck down the Federal prohibition of State-authorized sports wagering schemes. I was one of four original authors of that prohibition, the Professional and…





