Well, I respectfully disagree with the former attorney general's conclusions. I look at the treaty and I see one provision that arguably sets in place international entitlement rights, another provision that can be read to undermine the rights of parents to make decisions on how best to educate and otherwise care for their children with disabilities, and another provision of the treaty that can be read to obligate the United States government to pay for abortion services.
Mike Lee: “Well, I respectfully disagree with the former attorney general's conclusions. I look at the treaty and I see one…”
Editor's note · Context
Lee explains his opposition to the treaty, citing concerns about its implications for U.S. law and parental rights.
Share
More from Mike Lee
I can say confidently that the U.S. government has no business recognizing the Christianity of literally every other religious sect that worships Jesus Christ — with one exception.
Why is the federal bureaucracy in the child mutilation business? Americans don’t want to pay millions for these disturbing studies where hundreds of kids are experimented on with puberty-blocking drugs.
@LeaderJohnThune, I hereby object to any effort to put the Senate into recess in August—at least until such time as the Senate has passed the SAVE America Act—and hereby request a roll call vote. Do not assume you have my consent. You do…
the Antiquities Act was designed to protect specific objects and reserve only the smallest area compatible with their protection





