Mike Lee actually said...

"Whereas, with Rule of Reason analysis they could continue to take into account the presumption of patent validity and that would operate unhindered in that context."

"By the way, when we're in the context of a patent, isn't there something sort of internally inconsistent or contradictory about a standard that would require the patent holder in this context to produ..."

"In your testimony you note that we have a statutory directive that exists under current law that all patents are to be presumed valid."

"Pharmaceutical patents are extremely valuable and it's for good reason that they're valuable."