Mike Lee actually said...

I believe the intent of the CBM proceedings was to address some patents that had issued out of the United States Patent and Trademark Office...

So I think, Chairman Issa, you hit exactly the point which is that in the IPR proceedings, you have two sides to a proceeding.

The USPTO has successfully implemented the CBM program pursuant to the America Invents Act, meeting its congressional intent.

So if there is a heightened pleading requirement in the complaint, clearly there is an incentive to get every claim in that you think is all...