Mike Lee actually said...

"In your testimony you note that we have a statutory directive that exists under current law that all patents are to be presumed valid."

"By the way, when we're in the context of a patent, isn't there something sort of internally inconsistent or contradictory about a standard that would require the patent holder in this context to produ..."

"Whereas, with Rule of Reason analysis they could continue to take into account the presumption of patent validity and that would operate unhindered in that context."

"Pharmaceutical patents are extremely valuable and it's for good reason that they're valuable."