we are hearing a lot of concern about PAYGO. I have to tell you that when it comes to having credibility on this issue, as someone who is not a particularly partisan person, I always like to work on both sides of the aisle, I am a little upset that we are hearing this criticism about PAYGO from a group of folks who when they were in charge let the law expire. It is a law that existed for 12 years. It helped move us from deficits to surpluses. It moved us on the glide path to where we wouldn't be burdening future generations with debt, and that law expired. The bottom line is that law as it was written would have allowed this unemployment compensation legislation to go through under emergency spending. Now, the way that the law is written in this Congress, quite frankly, I think the law wasn't crafted properly because it should have allowed this to be emergency spending. That is why I, as a Blue Dog, am comfortable with this bill. But let me assure you, actions speak louder than words. There are so many words that get thrown out on the floor of the House, but actions speak louder than words. And the actions are this: who cares about deficits, who thinks deficits matter? I am not sure that the other side of the aisle does, and their track record demonstrates that. We've seen debt go up by $3 trillion during the first 6 years of the Bush administration with a Republican Congress.
Jim Matheson: “we are hearing a lot of concern about PAYGO. I have to tell you that when it comes to having credibility on this issue…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about PAYGO and government deficits during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Jim Matheson
I also think we have to be very careful about saying we only want to serve unserved, but underserved don't matter anymore.
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Utah will be postponed. The Clerk will read. The Clerk read as follows: Uranium Enrichment…
I have one more speaker, and I yield as much time as she may consume to the gentlewoman from New York (Ms. Meng).
I think it's the same threshold that requires us to make a decision to deficit spend. It's the same supermajority for that as well. So I think that what we do is we're putting a requirement in where, if you want to default or if you want…





