It has to do with the uranium tailings pile on the banks of the Colorado River in Moab, Utah. Now, that may sound like an interesting issue to have in a Defense authorization bill. It is not the first time it has been in a Defense authorization bill. The last time we dealt with this was when Congress was in session in the year 2000, and at that time Congress directed the Department urging them to move this uranium tailings pile. Make no mistake. This is right on the banks of a major river, and the environmental impact statement that looked at this pile indicated that it is a near certainty that at some point, if it is not moved, it is going to be flushed into the river. And there are 25 million users living downstream of this site. Now, this mill tailings site was part of our military efforts in the 1950s and 1960s when it came to our nuclear weapons efforts, and quite frankly, while Congress has voiced in the past on this very bill 7 years ago that it should be moved, the Department of Energy has exhibited tremendous inaction.
Jim Matheson: “It has to do with the uranium tailings pile on the banks of the Colorado River in Moab, Utah. Now, that may sound like…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the uranium tailings pile in Moab, Utah, during a Defense authorization bill debate.
Share
More from Jim Matheson
I stand in strong support of this amendment, as I do to the underlying bill. The amendment before us will provide much-needed liability protections to medical professionals to ensure that they are able to do what they are trained to do…
I think USDA is uniquely positioned to be an important voice in this circumstance because USDA, number one, understands rural America.
I do think it is important, your statement that we should continue with fossil fuel research.
I thank the gentleman for yielding, and I thank Mr. Latta for his work on this issue as well. This bill before us today is a product of several years of collaboration. It's a really complicated issue, and it's important that you have a lot…





