I appreciate the comments of my colleague from Kentucky about the challenges of across-the-board cuts. I feel like I was elected to come up with suggestions. If I could draft an amendment that would be ruled in order, I would specifically say it should be about the spending cuts, but I can't legislate on an appropriations bill. So I would hope that as we look at this amendment, we understand that people read the record of this conversation, it was the intent of Congress when I looked at this amendment that agencies are supposed to reduce their vehicle purchases by 20 percent as the best that Mr. Royce and I can do under the rules of the House. We are trying to offer a specific opportunity to cut spending. We think we have identified it well during this discussion. I urge my colleagues to support it. I yield back the balance of my time.
Jim Matheson: “I appreciate the comments of my colleague from Kentucky about the challenges of across-the-board cuts. I feel like I was…”
Editor's note · Context
Matheson discusses the need for specific spending cuts in vehicle purchases during a debate on an amendment.
Share
More from Jim Matheson
I thank Mr. Grijalva for his generosity in yielding me the time. I rise in support of H.R. 687, the Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act. Copper is such a critical part of our economy. It is used in electronics, plumbing…
I thank my colleague for yielding. It's a pleasure to join my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to discuss No Labels. You know, I think one thing that hasn't been mentioned tonight is the fact that it's about ``no labels.'' We're going…
I want to thank my colleague from Kentucky for allowing me the time. I think, as we look at the TRAIN Act today, you're going to hear a lot during this debate from both sides of the aisle; and there are going to be a lot of strong words…
I think the RxTEC proposal represents a consensus of a lot of the stakeholders. It does agree on a one-size-fits-all for the country and not 50 different State approaches.





