Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 2144, a bill to transfer excess Federal lands to the government of Guam. As the committee report on this bill correctly points out, excessive Federal land ownership often creates adverse local and regional economic impacts. As a general rule, I believe that transferring more control over Federal lands to State and local governments will result in more economic opportunity as well as better land management. Therefore, I support the basic premise of this bill. However, I was concerned that the original version of this bill permitted the government of Guam to continue to administer lands inside War in the Pacific National Historical Park, a park established nearly 15 years ago to commemorate the American liberation of Guam. It seemed reasonable to me to require the government of Guam to facilitate National Park Service management over these key inholdings by transferring them to the Secretary of the Interior.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker supports a bill to transfer excess federal lands to Guam and discusses its economic implications.
Share
More from James V. Hansen
In 1934 a forester by the name of C. J. Buck wrote a letter to Forest Service supervisors telling them to use no more clearcutting, favoring a shift to partial cutting and concepts of studying trees. This lasted for 20 years. So we have…
Mr. Chairman, the minority has looked at this particular amendment. We support it. I believe it is supported by the DOD, and I remember the Committee on Armed Services supported this, we feel it takes care of the problems that we are…
It makes a lot of difference. They do not clearcut as much as they used to in the past. They cut it back.
the minority has looked at the gentleman's amendment. We have no objection to it, think it adds to the bill, and we would accept it on this side.





