I just want to point out two items. First, this bill is not intended to influence in any way the current debate concerning the FCC's reforms to the Universal Service Fund. We are not in any way attempting to impact that. In addition, what we're really asking is that the FCC take into account in its rulemaking process the rural broadband needs. We are not exempting it from the process but are simply asking that that be taken into account as they go through the process. There is no exemption intended here. I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from New York (Mr. Owens). The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes appeared to have it.
Burgess Owens: “I just want to point out two items. First, this bill is not intended to influence in any way the current debate…”
On the recordMarch 27, 2012
Share
More from Burgess Owens
Jun 10, 2026
My legislation takes a straightforward approach, identifies suspicious student aid applications and ensures these applications are for who they say they are before dollars go out the door.
May 27, 2026
America’s promise has always been that if we educate our children and teach them to work hard, they will be able to find meaningful employment and create a better life than those who came before them. The MATCH Act helps restore that…
Jul 14, 2026
The Antiquities Act is crystal clear: presidential designations meant to protect objects should be 'confined to the smallest area compatible' with the proper care and management of those objects. That mandate was ignored. The mess started…





