Those of us who oppose the TEAM Act say that the legislation and the context of union-busting that is taking place in the country now is another form of intimidation, another form of ambush that can be set for workers and that we do not need a TEAM Act; what we need is more freedom to organize. We need new regulations, and perhaps a change in the law, not perhaps, but certainly a change in the law which would allow workers to organize more freely and without having to go through the tremendously long waiting period and the bureaucratic struggle they have to undertake now in order to organize, get a vote, and be recognized. The advantage at this point is on the side of management, and management has used that advantage in many ways. So, we oppose the TEAM Act.
Burgess Owens: “Those of us who oppose the TEAM Act say that the legislation and the context of union-busting that is taking place in…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the TEAM Act and advocating for workers' rights and freedom to organize.
Share
More from Burgess Owens
The Antiquities Act is crystal clear: presidential designations meant to protect objects should be 'confined to the smallest area compatible' with the proper care and management of those objects. That mandate was ignored. The mess started…
My bill builds on the good work already done by the Trump administration to protect taxpayer dollars and help safeguard the integrity of the student aid system by ensuring federal aid goes to real students.
This bill builds on the good work already done by the Trump administration to protect taxpayer dollars and help safeguard the integrity of the student aid system by ensuring federal aid goes to real students.





