a study by Harvard University and the Project for Excellence in Journalism has reaffirmed what many of us have long observed: Media coverage of Democratic Presidential candidates has been far more abundant and favorable than coverage of Republican Presidential candidates. The study found that 49 percent of all stories involved Democratic candidates, while just 31 percent involved Republican candidates. In addition, Democratic Presidential candidates received twice as much favorable coverage as Republicans, and Hillary Clinton drew nearly twice as much media coverage as any Republican nominee. Until we hold journalists to the highest standards of their profession, unfair reporting will continue to influence elections and undermine our democracy.
William F. Smith: “a study by Harvard University and the Project for Excellence in Journalism has reaffirmed what many of us have long…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing media bias in coverage of Democratic and Republican Presidential candidates.
Share
More from William F. Smith
I support H.R. 3971, the Death in Custody Reporting Act of 2007, and commend Chairman Conyers, Crime Subcommittee Chairman Scott, and Crime Subcommittee Ranking Member Gohmert for their commitment to this bipartisan legislation. The Death…
some people look at the huge, so- called economic stimulus bill and think it's a Christmas present. But the Federal Government is not Santa Claus. Elves are not producing this money. This money isn't free, and the American people will get…
I support better health care being made available for the mentally ill. Americans should have the freedom to choose health care plans that offer mental health benefits. I also support the passage of H.R. 1424, the ``Paul Wellstone Mental…
there is nothing more germane to the security of the American people than to take up the Senate bill as quickly as possible. Now I would like to reiterate my disappointment that the majority has raised a point of order against this motion…





