The issues we discuss today are those of equity and fairness. Every homeowner and every property owner across America deserves to have their day in court, and not just in court but in the right court. Many legislative initiatives are identified with an individual. We have Megan's Law, the Ryan White Act and the Ricky Ray bill. Today we consider H.R. 992, the Tucker Act Shuffle Relief Act. Maybe we should call it the Narromore Act or the Presault Act or any of the other names of the property owners whose cases demonstrate the real need for this legislation. W.O. and Eliza Narromore's property was flooded as a result of the government's operation of the Painted Rock Dam in Arizona. They first filed suit in 1980 in an attempt to force the United States to stop flooding their land. In 1988, their case had gone to the appeals court, and then had been sent back to the lower court for retrial. At that trial, the United States moved for dismissal of the case, saying the Narromores' claim should have been for compensation to the court of Federal claims. The Federal circuit agreed with the government and transferred the case to the court of Federal claims in 1992, sending the Narromores back to square one again. Today, 17 years later, their case is still pending.
William F. Smith: “The issues we discuss today are those of equity and fairness. Every homeowner and every property owner across America…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need for fairness in property owner legal cases during a discussion on H.R. 992.
Share
More from William F. Smith
sometimes media bias is most evident by the news that reporters choose not to cover. For example, where were the media when the Congressional Budget Office announced last week that the economic stimulus package would reduce the long-term…
Howard Kurtz, host of CNN's program ``Reliable Sources,'' has strongly criticized the media's coverage of Senator Barack Obama's breaking his promise that he would accept public campaign funds. Last Sunday, Kurtz argued: ``All of these…
While this proposal is marginally improved over the first proposal, it still contains flaws that make it defective. The fundamental flaw of the proposal is that it fails to reform the House Ethics Committee itself. The creation of another…
in the interests of transparency, because Republicans, the media and the American public were shut out of negotiations, I am suggesting a new name for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, this so-called stimulus bill. Based on what…





