On the recordSeptember 25, 2024
I have to tell you, I am saddened that the Senator from New Jersey chose to give no explanation for his objection; chose to give no reason to Francesca, why she is being denied; no reason to Elliston; no reason to Gavin. He had an opportunity to explain his objections. Do you know what he said? Nothing. Nearly 2 weeks ago was when I circulated this amendment to both sides of the aisle, and it cleared 99 Senators. He had a week and a half to object. Yesterday, this legislation was about to pass, and an hour before it was going to pass, the Senator from New Jersey raised his objection. He said last night: Ted, I haven't had time to read the bill. It had been circulated to his office 2 weeks earlier, but he said he hadn't had time to read the bill. I said: Great. I will delay this for a day so you can read the bill. The language in the bill is word for word verbatim the language you agreed to, you have voted for, and you negotiated. He said he had numerous substantive objections. If he does, we heard none of them, not a word of it. It makes me sad that he doesn't feel his constituents deserve any explanation for blocking legislation as important as this. Madam President, it is not lost on anyone that this is an election year. And I will say, absent a single substantive objection, the obvious inference is that this objection is being made because we have got an election in less than 6 weeks. I consider the Senator from New Jersey a friend.…





