I want to summarize my comments and say that this bill provides for the extension and expansion of a program to verify if employees are legally authorized to work in the U.S. But we have Representatives on both sides of the aisle who oppose this bill because it expands this current pilot program to all 50 States, when today the pilot program is currently covering only six States. That includes California, Texas, Florida, New York, Illinois, and Nebraska. They are the ones who have these pilot programs. This legislation would allow all the States then to have access to what is existent right now in the database. Again, I urge my colleagues to vote ``no'' on H.R. 2359.
Rubén Hinojosa: “I want to summarize my comments and say that this bill provides for the extension and expansion of a program to verify…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the expansion of a program to verify employee work authorization during House floor debate.
Share
More from Rubén Hinojosa
You made the statement that the HBCUs are a very important component of higher education, and I have been one of the strongest supporters of HBCUs.
In the last 4 years we have shown great improvement in graduation rates, in enrollment in higher education, and graduation, even, at the colleges.
I am encouraged that we are doing some things right and helping a lot of people who under the conditions that our ranking member, Bobby Scott, gave that could not afford it or had preexisting medical conditions, are now covered.
In 2009, prior to ACA, 40 percent of the families in my congressional district were uninsured. Today, in 2016, only 20 percent are uninsured.





