I rise today, as I did a year ago, in strong opposition to the gentleman from Colorado's (Mr. Tancredo) amendment. I hope that the Tancredo amendment will be ruled nongermane. I felt obligated as an American to come to the House floor to remind this body of what America stands for as well as to question why anyone in the House of Representatives is offering such an amendment instead of focusing on the immigration reform measures such as 'The SOLVE Act,' H.R. 4262, the brainchild of the gentleman from Chicago, Illinois (Mr. Gutierrez). The SOLVE Act would provide for earned adjustment to reward hard work, reunify families, establish a temporary worker program that protects the United States and foreign workers and strengthens national security under the immigration laws of the United States. The Gutierrez legislation is constructive while, on the other hand, the gentleman from Colorado's (Mr. Tancredo) amendment fails to promote improvement or development. As is inscribed in the Statue of Liberty, we need to remember here in Congress the generous invitation that the United States has always sent to the world.
Rubén Hinojosa: “I rise today, as I did a year ago, in strong opposition to the gentleman from Colorado's (Mr. Tancredo) amendment. I…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to immigration reform during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Rubén Hinojosa
I am proud to rise to recognize my longtime chief of staff, Connie Jean Humphrey, who is retiring after a long and distinguished career on Capitol Hill. It is an honor and a privilege to recognize Connie's many years of service and…
On rollcall No. 278, had I been present, I would have voted ``no.'' Amendment Offered by Mr. Foster The Acting CHAIR (Mr. Woodall). The unfinished business is the demand for a recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentleman from…
Today, in my congressional district, because of the Affordable Care Act there are over 100,000 individuals who now have health insurance.
On rollcall No. 148, had I been present, I would have voted ``no.'' The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the resolution. The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that the ayes appeared to have it. Recorded Vote…





