Well, Mr. Speaker, there they go again, my colleagues on the other side of the aisle feigning moral outrage about something they think they might have imagined they read accurately reported in the paper. The outrage of the week apparently is the fact that I had the temerity to admit publicly that, if I lived in a free world, I would have a world in which I would be free to choose personally and individually that I, as an individual American citizen, would have the freedom to decide for myself whether or not I would enroll myself in a Government-provided benefits program. Now I do not have the freedom today to decline from paying my FICA taxes to fund that program for those that are enrolled in it today, and I accept that I pay my taxes. I just made the observation yesterday that, when I am 65, I would like to be free to choose not to become, in any extent, a ward of the state. I would like to choose, if I dare make the choice for myself, to not have the Government decide any part of my health care destiny.
Richard K. Armey: “Well, Mr. Speaker, there they go again, my colleagues on the other side of the aisle feigning moral outrage about…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing personal freedom regarding government-provided benefits and health care choices.
Share
More from Richard K. Armey
I am pleased to announce to this body that we have some new additions to our congressional family, a new addition to the Abel family. Williams James Abel arrived the night before last, yesterday, in the early hours of the morning, a…
this body demonstrated on April 24 that there is nothing to be learned from the second kick of a mule. Unfortunately, it took 3 months and several more kicks for the other body to wake up, and there is no way that we will set our good work…
Mr. Speaker, I believe we could probably find a pretty unanimous consensus in America that there is probably no grief that comes to a parent that is greater than the grief of losing a child. In fact, this Nation has on many, many occasions…
Let me first, Mr. Chairman, say that those that are on the cutting edge of technology and wanting to provide it are protected in the base text of the bill by limiting their liability and banning punitive damages, just like we have done in…





