Of course as the gentleman understands, we have made a commitment to openness. We always understood that that would require more time on this and a variety of other legislative efforts, such as H.R. 5 is proving to be the case. It is our belief that this helps us to demonstrate our commitment to openness.
Discussing the commitment to openness in legislative efforts.
Share
More from Richard K. Armey
I thank the gentlewoman. My final response would be that if indeed it was the volition of this body to do only the very least we could do, we would, in fact, take up the very least that was done by the other body. But it is our hope we can…
Mr. Speaker, I believe we could probably find a pretty unanimous consensus in America that there is probably no grief that comes to a parent that is greater than the grief of losing a child. In fact, this Nation has on many, many occasions…
These are exactly the proposals that were applauded across this land in 1962 when first proposed by then President John F. Kennedy. They worked in 1962. The only thing that was different is by 1962, we had never enacted anything in our Tax…
The answer is yes on both counts. The Federal government does not have the authority to nationalize driver's licenses and other identification cards. And this legislation would not give them that authority. The authority to design and…
Other voices in this conversation
