I just want to clarify about using the multi-stories. Most of the housing that we saw, and I am not going to say all of it, we didn't see all of the housing, but most of the housing is one- and two-story. There may have been some three-story. And some of those are walkups; in other words, the second story is a part of the first part of the unit; in other words, it is a two-story unit. So the argument that you are dealing with a high rise where there is floor 3 up to 10 is usable, in these particular housing units that we saw there was not multistory housing.
Randy Neugebauer: “I just want to clarify about using the multi-stories. Most of the housing that we saw, and I am not going to say all of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the characteristics of housing observed during a site visit.
Share
More from Randy Neugebauer
I think we have really been talking about the people that we need to be talking about: the consumers of financial products. Those are actually the people who are most affected by this.
I remain concerned that many of the Bureau's actions demonstrate a regulatory paternalism.
I think it is quite clear that this proposal goes far beyond anything EPA is authorized to do under the Clean Air Act, and I just think that is troubling that a regulatory agency would essentially ignore what Congress has given it…
EPA is attempting an unconstitutional trifecta, usurping the prerogatives of the states, Congress, and the federal courts all at once.





