On the recordJune 18, 2015
I have no additional speakers, and I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. First of all, let me say to my colleagues that they should be appalled by this process. This is again being brought up under a process where nobody--not just Democrats, but Republicans as well--can offer amendments. In the United States Senate when TPA was considered, they were able to offer amendments, but when it came before the House last week, we were told we could offer no amendments. The excuse we were given is because, if we passed it, it would go right to the White House. But what we are doing today is actually not going to the White House. It is going back to the Senate, yet we are again being presented with a closed process. Why can't Members of both sides of the aisle have an opportunity to make their views known on this important issue? Why are we being shut out when it comes to the issue of trade and TPA? I heard a number of speakers say that this debate is not about TPP. Well, this is indeed about the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Whether or not TPP is implemented will depend almost entirely on whether the President has fast track in place. The vote on fast track, or TPA, will determine the fate of the TPP trade deal. So a ``yes'' vote on TPA is a ``yes'' vote on TPP. It is that simple. History shows that is how it has worked time and time and time again. Fast track is not just about TPP.…
