That is correct. I think he could have not appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court doesn't take a lot of these cases. He could have probably justified that and rationalized that, but if he believed that the existing Alabama reapportionment system was duly enacted and defensible, an attorney general of integrity would appeal to the Supreme Court, and he did so, to the detriment of the interest of his political party.
Discussing the actions of an attorney general regarding Alabama's reapportionment system.
Share
More from Pete Sessions
That is why we respect the ability of local people to make local decisions and to come up with an answer.
It is also President Biden who finds himself at the vise grip of employees who decide that they do not like his policies related to Gaza.
You talk about fairness, you talk about cost-effectiveness, you talk about being pragmatic, you talk about science-based answers.
Other voices in this conversation
