They criticize Mr. Sutton for persuading the Supreme Court, like it is something bad. And I make a note that the Supreme Court ruled with him and agreed with his position. I just ask, Is there something wrong, is it disqualifying for an attorney to prevail on the Supreme Court?
Questioning criticism of an attorney's success before the Supreme Court.
Share
More from Pete Sessions
It is important that the dollars that we give you, however, equally are tracked, known, and understood.
I view that this Department is failing to protect this country, which is its core mission.
Mr. Chairman, thank you very much. And Chairman Comer, I want to thank you for your not only meeting with at least Republicans before this hearing, but expressing your confidence that you believe that we could have a thoughtful meeting…
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: At the end of the bill (before the short title), insert the following: Sec. __. None of the funds made…
Other voices in this conversation
