I was disappointed last night that the President and my good friend and very effective leader of the Judiciary Committee, Senator Leahy, have politicized a very important decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. The Justices didn't take an oath not to reverse bad precedent. They swore an oath of fidelity to the U.S. Constitution, and the first amendment guarantees the right of free speech. For over a decade, I warned against this, and others warned this legislation we were passing violated the first amendment of the U.S. Constitution. In fact, one of the supporters of the amendment, Senator Feingold, at one point offered a constitutional amendment to amend the first amendment because he recognized this campaign restriction on spending during an election cycle ran afoul of the Constitution, but at some point they decided to go forward with it.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses concerns over the politicization of a Supreme Court decision and its implications for the First Amendment.
Share
More from Pete Sessions
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: At the end of the bill (before the short title), insert the following: Sec. __. None of the funds made…
It is very apparent to me that competition is one of those factors that is not part of your equation for the marketplace.
We think we have to make it work, and we think in Congress, we have got to work together to make that work.
It is also President Biden who finds himself at the vise grip of employees who decide that they do not like his policies related to Gaza.





